PDA

View Full Version : Luna the Killer Whale Believed Killed


Dialectic
Mar 13th, 2006, 07:52 PM
This is a pretty sad story about the death of Luna the Killer Whale. I have a point.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060311/ap_on_sc/lonely_luna

By PEGGY ANDERSEN, Associated Press Writer Sat Mar 11, 6:08 PM ET

SEATTLE - Luna, the juvenile killer whale from Washington state waters who got lost in Canada's Nootka Sound five years ago, apparently died when he was accidentally struck by a tugboat propeller, Canadian authorities said.

Luna, known to scientists as L-98 and a member of one of Washington's three resident orca pods, or family groups, wandered into Nootka Sound on the west side of Vancouver Island in 2001 and stayed, worrying activists and annoying boaters and seaplane pilots with his friendly curiosity.

"We don't know 100 percent but we do believe it's Luna," Lara Sloan, spokeswoman with Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans, said Friday.

Transient killer whales, which range along the coast preying on seals and other marine mammals, occasionally come through the long, twisty sound, but tend to avoid human traffic.

The dangerously friendly Luna was part of the region's "resident population," which spends much of the year in U.S. and Canadian inland waters. They live and hunt in family groups and mostly eat fish, especially salmon,

The 1,700-horsepower seagoing tug had pulled into sheltered waters near Conception Point to escape rough weather in the Pacific. Luna, known to enjoy playing in boat wakes, "was swimming under the vessel and was hit by a propeller," Sloan said.

"It was a really big tugboat ó 104 feet," she said.

The vessel was idling when Luna approached.

"Luna came over as he does and was interacting ó disappearing under the hull and so on. ... He must have gotten drawn into the propeller," said government research scientist and orca expert John Ford.

The tug's big propeller, contained in a cylinder, "generates a lot of current. ... It would have been a sudden death."

"The skipper is reported to be greatly distressed. He called the coast guard immediately after it happened," Sloan said from agency offices in Vancouver, British Columbia. "A lot of people here are pretty shocked and saddened."

"It was one of our fears about what might happen to Luna," Ford said. "Of course he's been engaging in these risky interactions with boats for several years now."

Luna likely was not familiar with the size and power of this vessel. While the carcass was not immediately recovered, "it seems almost certain to me that this is indeed Luna," Ford said. "And it's almost certain it was fatal."

Ford last saw Luna in January, when Ford visited the sound in a 200-foot research boat. "He came over. He was always curious."

"It's a very tragic ending," he said.

Luna was about 6 years old. Orca life stages roughly parallel those of humans, so he was the killer-whale equivalent of a young child.

"The whale has always flirted with this kind of danger," said Fred Felleman of Ocean Advocates in Seattle, who had pressed for more efforts to reunite Luna with his family. "It was like that old children's cartoon, 'Are you my mother?' Orcas are very social animals, and this was the only way to get his social needs met."

Felleman called on authorities to recover Luna's remains and learn what they could about him. "Failure to do so would be a huge missed research opportunity, as indeed his whole life had been," he said.

Lonely and apparently seeking contact, the whale had damaged and disabled several boats over the years. Lately, he had been gathering scars from increasingly frequent close calls with propellers, but apparently no serious injuries.

Canada tried in 2004 to reunite him with his pod in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, which separates Washington state from Vancouver Island.

That effort was scrapped when local Indians lured Luna away from the net pen intended to snare him. The Mowachaht/Muchalaht First Nation believed the orca embodied the spirit of their dead chief, Ambrose Maquinna, and did not want him forcibly removed.

Luna's advocates had hoped he might reunite naturally with his family as they passed the mouth of Nootka Sound.

Members of L-pod, Luna's relatives who spend summers chasing salmon off Washington state's San Juan Islands, occasionally travel on the west side of the island. But even the most ardent supporters of a natural reunion agreed it would take a lot of luck for Luna and L-pod to find each other.

In 2002, the U.S. and Canadian governments successfully reunited a Canadian orca, A-73 or Springer, with her family after her mother died and she wandered into busy Puget Sound. She had only been separated from Canada's A-pod for a period of months.

The most significant passage of the above article, to me, is this:

Canada tried in 2004 to reunite him with his pod in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, which separates Washington state from Vancouver Island.

That effort was scrapped when local Indians lured Luna away from the net pen intended to snare him. The Mowachaht/Muchalaht First Nation believed the orca embodied the spirit of their dead chief, Ambrose Maquinna, and did not want him forcibly removed.

So what exactly happened here?

From an integral and distinctly un-P.C. point of view, there was a massive fuck-up by the Canadian authorities in respecting the native wishes.

What occurred was Green-meme Canadian values (sensitive, caring, respectful, ecological) wished to save and better the whale's life, which was commendable. Natives, operating on Purple/Red religious pre-rational beliefs, moved to block Green's attempt within a Green system.

Green, trapped by its own sensitivity and respect for Native values, acceeded to their wishes. The whale is dead, the chief is still dead, the tugboat skipper feels terrible, and the community is saddened.

What should have happened was this:

Canada: We gotta reunite that whale
Natives: No. It's a slap in our faces. That's our chief!
Canada: Fuck you (in a nice way). That's not your chief (in a nice way). We're sending the whale back.
*Whale gets sent back*
Canada and Natives together: Let's fix our economic, cultural, educational, and drug/alcohol problems.

One last note: I am aware that the solution reached may have been the integral one. Perhaps political concerns outweighed all others, and the whale's safety was sacrificed for the sake of the peace. I understand this, and of course, I'm not privy to the details of the decision-making. If this is the case, that's even sadder.

Perhaps the fuck-up of this decision, then, could be a precedent, something to point to, when making similar decisions in the future.

cattygurl
Mar 13th, 2006, 08:17 PM
Well said, D.

I've gotten in some heated arguments with Japanese and Nords on a eco board over the hunting of whales. Same goes for decimation of bonobos through the practice of bush meat. Different stories, but thought I would bring it up. I'd be more than happy to discuss it here or speak about it on a different thread.

Dialectic
Mar 14th, 2006, 07:00 PM
This is also an example of how difficult it is to make "integrally-optimal" decisions. Optimally, given that the well-being of the whale was (or should have been) the priority in this situation, the optimal decision would have been to move the whale to the strait where it could join a pod and get its social needs met.

Now just to use this as an illustrative example, let's just say, hypothetically, that the Canadians in charge of this were integral-minded, and not stuck in hyper-sensitive or rational amoral modes. It may have been the case that not listening to the Natives and moving the whale against their wishes would've caused a mini-political/ social crisis: perhaps whoever was in charge decided that the safety of the whale just wasn't worth the hassle and political risk of angering the Natives. In this case, as I said in my first post, sacrificing the safety of the whale would have been the integral move, because social/political needs would have superceded the whale's needs from the human point of view.

What I'm getting at here is that "higher-order" cognitions still must deal with everything around them - less sophisticated values, beliefs, and behaviors - and come to "sub-optimal" decisions because of more pressing needs to maintain harmony among the different levels of values (the stability of the "spiral). This is why systemic change takes so long, and largely amounts to a numbers game: "second-tier" integral cognition constitutes less than 1% of the world population at the moment, and as such, their influence is limited, and they are stuck making decisions that look suspiciously unsophisticated. Since numbers are rising, however, especially with the "information revolution" happening all around us, this could change relatively quickly (measured against human history).