<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dooces&#8221; are wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/</link>
	<description>Uniting the Asian Conscience</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: awong</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7117</link>
		<dc:creator>awong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7117</guid>
		<description>the 64bit is a huge issue, but I havent even moved onto a 64bit processor, I just think if microsoft is going to fix its issues on 64bit, they will have to force it on the users despite the backlash.  But since I stopped playing the latest games, the most basic of PC's will do the job, no vista for me heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 64bit is a huge issue, but I havent even moved onto a 64bit processor, I just think if microsoft is going to fix its issues on 64bit, they will have to force it on the users despite the backlash.  But since I stopped playing the latest games, the most basic of PC&#8217;s will do the job, no vista for me heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehwan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7116</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7116</guid>
		<description>I'm absolutely loving it.  I can't believe I no longer have to wait half an hour for my PC to start up (it took five minutes when I first bought the PC five years ago, and I thought that was fast!).  I'm still getting used to some of the Mac quirks and shortcuts, but so far it has been nothing short of amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m absolutely loving it.  I can&#8217;t believe I no longer have to wait half an hour for my PC to start up (it took five minutes when I first bought the PC five years ago, and I thought that was fast!).  I&#8217;m still getting used to some of the Mac quirks and shortcuts, but so far it has been nothing short of amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King4aDay</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>King4aDay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>"You’re a designer, right? You probably use Macs all the time, right? Is everything I said above correct?

I’ve heard that PCs are still better for “PC things” such as accounting and stuff, but I never require much power in those activities."

Right you are, sir.

The Unix programmed OS is an incredibly stable platform. Not only does it prevent system crashes, but even program crashes. Also, both the OS and the majority of 3rd party programs are written to 64 bit now, which isn't yet true in the PC world.

And, of course, the hackers aren't that interested in Macs, (not enough of them to bring the World to a premature end) And some of the simpler security measures are much simpler on a Mac--like signing in and working as a non-administrator so some Bozo can't take over your entire machine and destroy you!

How are you enjoying the interface? Cool huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’re a designer, right? You probably use Macs all the time, right? Is everything I said above correct?</p>
<p>I’ve heard that PCs are still better for “PC things” such as accounting and stuff, but I never require much power in those activities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right you are, sir.</p>
<p>The Unix programmed OS is an incredibly stable platform. Not only does it prevent system crashes, but even program crashes. Also, both the OS and the majority of 3rd party programs are written to 64 bit now, which isn&#8217;t yet true in the PC world.</p>
<p>And, of course, the hackers aren&#8217;t that interested in Macs, (not enough of them to bring the World to a premature end) And some of the simpler security measures are much simpler on a Mac&#8211;like signing in and working as a non-administrator so some Bozo can&#8217;t take over your entire machine and destroy you!</p>
<p>How are you enjoying the interface? Cool huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehwan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7109</guid>
		<description>awong,

I think you're way ahead of the average computer user.  I'd be unable to put a computer together and configuring every part of it.  I love the concept of Linux, but I know it wouldn't bode well for me if I tried to install and configure it myself.  Steve-O's software so far seems to be all I need--but that's only because I'm not a power user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awong,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re way ahead of the average computer user.  I&#8217;d be unable to put a computer together and configuring every part of it.  I love the concept of Linux, but I know it wouldn&#8217;t bode well for me if I tried to install and configure it myself.  Steve-O&#8217;s software so far seems to be all I need&#8211;but that&#8217;s only because I&#8217;m not a power user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awong</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7105</link>
		<dc:creator>awong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7105</guid>
		<description>yeah unix based I have no problems with, typing this on my linux laptop.  I guess I enjoy the thrill of putting together and configuring every little part of it.  Currently after getting everything running on linux, definitely much more stable and far less issues on an older laptop that runs better than my faster desktop.  I guess I just dont like being limited to what steve-o wants me to use.  Though hardware wise probably the apple qc might be better for using other boot options, something my friend wanted to do if it wasnt so expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah unix based I have no problems with, typing this on my linux laptop.  I guess I enjoy the thrill of putting together and configuring every little part of it.  Currently after getting everything running on linux, definitely much more stable and far less issues on an older laptop that runs better than my faster desktop.  I guess I just dont like being limited to what steve-o wants me to use.  Though hardware wise probably the apple qc might be better for using other boot options, something my friend wanted to do if it wasnt so expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehwan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7100</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7100</guid>
		<description>Haha...good deal.  I would have stopped at "take over the world," but saving humanity from itself is a pretty worthwhile goal too.  I'll have to think about it.

Not sure about that websiteoutlook though.  According to them, you could buy two Googles for the price of a Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha&#8230;good deal.  I would have stopped at &#8220;take over the world,&#8221; but saving humanity from itself is a pretty worthwhile goal too.  I&#8217;ll have to think about it.</p>
<p>Not sure about that websiteoutlook though.  According to them, you could buy two Googles for the price of a Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minorTruths</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>minorTruths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>When this site finally gets 'shown the money', will any of the members get a slice of the action as loyal stakeholders? :-)  Right now, according to http://www.websiteoutlook.com, this site is only worth around $11K.

I say the site should totally sell itself out.  Money equals power.  Hit the viewers softly, subtly, subliminally with that AA shit while rackng in the ad revenues from big, dumb, money grubbing, mainstream corporate America and the world...oops, I meant the big, nice, reputable, socially conscious yet amazingly profitable companies of the world.

So,
step 1, invent a hook
step 2, get public to be hooked
step 3, make money,
step 4, activate subliminally implanted mental triggers
step 5, take over the world
step 6, save humanity from itself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this site finally gets &#8217;shown the money&#8217;, will any of the members get a slice of the action as loyal stakeholders? :-)  Right now, according to <a href="http://www.websiteoutlook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.websiteoutlook.com</a>, this site is only worth around $11K.</p>
<p>I say the site should totally sell itself out.  Money equals power.  Hit the viewers softly, subtly, subliminally with that AA shit while rackng in the ad revenues from big, dumb, money grubbing, mainstream corporate America and the world&#8230;oops, I meant the big, nice, reputable, socially conscious yet amazingly profitable companies of the world.</p>
<p>So,<br />
step 1, invent a hook<br />
step 2, get public to be hooked<br />
step 3, make money,<br />
step 4, activate subliminally implanted mental triggers<br />
step 5, take over the world<br />
step 6, save humanity from itself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaehwan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>jaehwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>awong,

I think it's mostly the Unix-based OS that make them more secure and reliable.  Unix systems hardly ever crash.  I'm admittedly still learning about it, but the installs are totally different too.  I think that the installations go much deeper into the OS when you install new programs on Windows, but it doesn't seem to go that deep on OS--it's more just like a program running off a disk.  I could be wrong about this, but I installed and uninstalled and reinstalled (still learning) Firefox yesterday, and it was more similar to deleting a file than uninstalling a program.

Maybe the more "shallow" installs make it harder for virus makers?  

Plus, think about the fact that Apple makes both the software/OS and the computers.  They may be more compatible based on the fact that they come from the same place.

King, 

You're a designer, right?  You probably use Macs all the time, right?  Is everything I said above correct?

I've heard that PCs are still better for "PC things" such as accounting and stuff, but I never require much power in those activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awong,</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s mostly the Unix-based OS that make them more secure and reliable.  Unix systems hardly ever crash.  I&#8217;m admittedly still learning about it, but the installs are totally different too.  I think that the installations go much deeper into the OS when you install new programs on Windows, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to go that deep on OS&#8211;it&#8217;s more just like a program running off a disk.  I could be wrong about this, but I installed and uninstalled and reinstalled (still learning) Firefox yesterday, and it was more similar to deleting a file than uninstalling a program.</p>
<p>Maybe the more &#8220;shallow&#8221; installs make it harder for virus makers?  </p>
<p>Plus, think about the fact that Apple makes both the software/OS and the computers.  They may be more compatible based on the fact that they come from the same place.</p>
<p>King, </p>
<p>You&#8217;re a designer, right?  You probably use Macs all the time, right?  Is everything I said above correct?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that PCs are still better for &#8220;PC things&#8221; such as accounting and stuff, but I never require much power in those activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King4aDay</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7095</link>
		<dc:creator>King4aDay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7095</guid>
		<description>Apple rules. 
Unix-based OS rules too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple rules.<br />
Unix-based OS rules too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awong</title>
		<link>http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7094</link>
		<dc:creator>awong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefighting44s.com/archives/2008/08/18/dooces-are-wild/#comment-7094</guid>
		<description>is apple really more secure?  Wouldnt it have the same issues as windows if more people use it?  And arent they just x86 just apple spec'ing them out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is apple really more secure?  Wouldnt it have the same issues as windows if more people use it?  And arent they just x86 just apple spec&#8217;ing them out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

